Comparison of Aiming Point Strategy Algorithms and Their Assessment for Volumetric Solar Receivers

Autor/innen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v2i.822

Schlagworte:

Solar Tower Pants, Aiming Point Strategy, Optimization, Heuristic, Metaheuristic, Local Search

Abstract

The present work summarizes the work done within the scope of CATION, CHLOE, and HECTOR projects related to the aiming point strategies optimization algorithms applied to volumetric solar receivers. Several optimization methods have been applied in the literature for optimizing the aiming strategy of solar power tower plants. However, the use of these algorithms for the requirements of volumetric solar receivers and solar fuel applications has not been accomplished. Herein, the problem is formulated as a constrained optimization problem whose objective function is a combination of the total power on the receiver surface and the flux homogeneity. A comparison of the results is presented in this work. It will be seen that TABU search and SA algorithms are the most efficient in terms of computation time and, in addition, the first one shows very good results in power and spillage. The rest of the mentioned algorithms are much slower and, in general, the results are slightly worse.

Downloads

Keine Nutzungsdaten vorhanden.

Literaturhinweise

1. A. Grobler, “Aiming strategies for small central receiver systems”, 2015. PhD Stellenbosch University.

2. B. Grange, G. Flamant, “Aiming Strategy on a Prototype-Scale Solar Receiver: Coupling of Tabu Search, Ray-Tracing and Thermal Models”. Sustainability 2021, 13, 3920.

3. M. S. Besarati, D. Yogi Goswami, E. K, Stefanakos, “Optimal heliostat aiming strategy for uniform distribution of heat flux on the receiver of a solar power tower plant”, Energy Conversion and Management 84, vol. 84, 2014, pp. 234-243, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2014.04.030.

4. D. Maldonado, R. Flesch, A. Reinholz., P. Scharzbözl, “Evaluation of Aim Point Optimization Methods”, SolarPACES 2017 AIP Conf. Proc. 2033, doi https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5067061.

5. A. Grobler, “Aiming strategies for small central receiver systems”, in Proceedings Grobler, 2015, doi: https://api.semanticscholar.org/CorpusID:108628498.

6. I. Les, A. Mutuberria, P. Schöttl., P. Nitz., E. Leonardi, L. Pisani, “Optical performance comparison between heliostat field generation algorithms”. In: 2018 Proceedings SolarPaces.

Downloads

Veröffentlicht

2024-10-15

Zitationsvorschlag

Mellado, E., Itoiz, O., Mutuberria, A., Sánchez, M., & Puerto, J. (2024). Comparison of Aiming Point Strategy Algorithms and Their Assessment for Volumetric Solar Receivers. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 2. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v2i.822
##plugins.generic.dates.received## 2023-10-11
##plugins.generic.dates.accepted## 2024-07-10
##plugins.generic.dates.published## 2024-10-15