Fast and Accurate Computation of Flux Density Formed by Solar Concentrators and Heliostats

Francois Hénault; Gilles Flamant; Cyril Caliot

doi:10.52825/solarpaces.v2i.971

Authors

Francois Hénault Université Grenoble Alpes https://orcid.org/0009-0008-4825-5519
Gilles Flamant Laboratoire Procédés, Matériaux et Energie Solaire
Cyril Caliot Université de Pau et des Pays de l'Adour https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3994-5637

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v2i.971

Keywords:

Solar Concentrator, Heliostat, Flux Density, Ray Tracing, Optimization

Abstract

Computing the flux densities provided by solar concentrators or focusing heliostats can be done in two different ways: A grid ray-tracing (GRT) procedure that makes use of a large number of ray bundles, starting from the solar disk and finally impinging the focal plane of the concentrator. The method is reliable and accurate, but requires extensive computing times. Alternatively, the flux densities can be estimated by using convolution algorithms. This latter method requires much less computing time, but is known to be less accurate when the incidence angle of the sunrays on the reflector increases. The objective of this contribution is to define an algorithm based on convolution products and fast Fourier transforms having high accuracy. The results show that RMS error differences between both models are typically lower then 1%.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] P. Garcia, A. Ferrière, J.J. Bézian, “Codes for solar flux calculation dedicated to central receiver system applications: A comparative review,” Solar Energy vol. 82, p. 189-197, 2008, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2007.08.004.

[2] Alberto Sánchez-González, “Analytic function for heliostat flux mapping with astigmatism and defocus,” Solar Energy vol. 241, p. 24-38, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2022.05.045.

[3] M. Coquand, F. Hénault, C. Caliot, “Backward-gazing method for measuring solar concentrators shape errors,” Applied Optics vol. 56, p. 2029-2037, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1364/AO.56.002029.

[4] B. Bonduelle, B. Rivoire, A. Ferriere, “La centrale expérimentale Thémis: bilan et perspectives,” Revue de Physique Appliquée vol. 24, p. 453-461, 1989, doi: https://doi.org/10.1051/rphysap:01989002404045300.

[5] F. Lipps, “Four different views of the heliostat flux density integral,” Solar Energy vol. 8, p. 555-560, 1976, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(76)90075-X.

[6] F. J. Collado, “One-point fitting of the flux density produced by a heliostat,” Solar Energy vol. 84, p. 673-684, 2010, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2010.01.019.

[7] A. Salomé, F. Chhel, G. Flamant, A. Ferrière, F. Thiery, “Control of the flux distribution on a solar tower receiver using an optimized aiming point strategy: Application to THEMIS solar tower,” Solar Energy vol. 94, p. 352-366, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2013.02.025].

[8] F. Hénault, “Fast computation of solar concentrating ratio in presence of opto-mechanical errors,” Solar Energy vol. 112, p. 183-193, 2015, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.solener.2014.12.002.

[9] P. Jose, “The flux through the focal spot of a solar furnace,” Solar Energy vol. 1, p. 19-22, 1957, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/0038-092X(57)90167-6.