Hybridization of Concentrated Solar Thermal With Geothermal and Biomass Power

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v2i.935

Keywords:

CST, Hybridization, Geothermal Power Plants, Biomass

Abstract

While Geothermal Power Plants (GPPs) can be a reliable renewable energy source, this reliability can decrease over the years due to brine mass flow declining. This reduced mass flow causes extra capacity unused in the GPP turbines. This problem can be overcome by hybridizing GPPs with CST and biomass. These three thermal technologies can, in theory, complement each other if all the resources are present at the exact location. This is the scenario for this study, as the location for the case study is the Kızıldere 2 (KZD2) GPP in Denizli, Turkiye, operated by Zorlu Energy. This region has sufficient potential for all three technologies: CST, geothermal, and biomass. Furthermore, by building a topping cycle using CST and biomass, it is possible to generate additional power. This study utilizes a topping steam Rankine cycle run equally by CST and biomass, and, as a result, the 20% excess capacity in the GPP turbine is used while generating an additional 20 MWe of power.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

R. DiPippo, Geothermal Power Plants: Principles, Applications, Case Studies and Environmental Impact. Oxford, U.K.: Butterworth-Heinemann, 2012.

Á. Lentz and R. Almanza, “Solar–geothermal hybrid system,” Applied Thermal Engineering, vol. 26, no. 14–15, pp. 1537–1544, Oct. 2006, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2005.12.008.

N. Bonyadi, E. Johnson, and D. Baker, “Technoeconomic and exergy analysis of a solar geothermal hybrid electric power plant using a novel combined cycle,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 156, pp. 542–554, Jan. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2017.11.052.

G. Dimarzio, L. Angelini, B. Price, S. Harris, and C. Chin, “The Stillwater Triple Hybrid Power Plant: Integrating GeoThermal, Solar Photovoltaic and Solar Thermal Power Generation,” Apr. 2015.

T. Srinivas and B. V. Reddy, “Hybrid solar-biomass power plant without energy storage,” Case Stud. Therm. Eng., vol. 2, pp. 75–81, Mar. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.csite.2013.12.004.

C. M. I. Hussain, B. Norton, and A. Duffy, “Comparison of hybridizing options for solar heat, biomass and heat storage for electricity generation in Spain,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 222, p. 113231, Oct. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2020.113231.

E. Middelhoff, L. Andrade Furtado, J. H. Peterseim, B. Madden, F. Ximenes, and N. Florin, “Hybrid concentrated solar biomass (HCSB) plant for electricity generation in Australia: Design and evaluation of techno-economic and environmental performance,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 240, p. 114244, Jul. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2021.114244.

S. Briola, R. Gabbrielli, and A. Bischi, “Off-design performance analysis of a novel hybrid binary geothermal-biomass power plant in extreme environmental conditions,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 195, pp. 210–225, Sep. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.05.008.

H. Chen, Y. Wang, J. Li, G. Xu, J. Lei, and T. Liu, “Thermodynamic analysis and economic assessment of an improved geothermal power system integrated with a biomass-fired cogeneration plant,” Energy, vol. 240, p. 122477, Feb. 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.2021.122477.

F. D. Porto, G. Pasqui, and M. Fedeli, “Geothermal Power Plant Production Boosting by Biomass Combustion: Cornia 2 Case Study,” Sep. 2016.

K. Li, C. Liu, S. Jiang, and Y. Chen, “Review on hybrid geothermal and solar power systems,” Journal of Cleaner Production, vol. 250, p. 119481, Nov. 2019. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119481

U. Serpen and R. DiPippo, “Turkey - a geothermal success story: A Retrospective and Prospective Assessment,” Geothermics, vol. 101, p. 102370, Feb. 2022. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.geothermics.2022.102370

“Solar Resource Maps of Turkey,” Solargis, https://solargis.com/maps-and-gis-data/download/turkey (accessed Oct. 4, 2023).

K. Kaygusuz, “Prospect of concentrating solar power in Turkey: The sustainable future,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 15, no. 1, pp. 808–814, Jan. 2011. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2010.09.042

B. Mutlu, D. Baker, and F. Kazanç, “Development and analysis of the novel hybridization of a single-flash geothermal power plant with biomass driven SCO2-Steam Rankine combined cycle,” Entropy, vol. 23, no. 6, p. 766, Jun. 2021. doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/e23060766

G. Cassini, “DESIGN AND SIMULATION OF HYBRID GEOTHERMAL AND SOLAR THERMAL POWER PLANT Case study: Kızıldere II plant,” M.S. thesis, Università degli Studi di Napoli Federico II Scuola Politecnica e delle Scienze di Base, Naples, Italy 2021.

Therminol VP-1 Heat Transfer Fluid, Eastman. [Online]. Available: https://www.therminol.com/sites/therminol/files/documents/TF09A_Therminol_VP1.pdf

A. M. Patnode, “Simulation and performance evaluation of Parabolic Trough Solar Power plants,” M.S. thesis, Dept. Mech. Eng., Univ. of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI, USA, 2006.

Published

2024-09-16

How to Cite

Çelebi, B., Rohani, S., Baker, D., Halaçoğlu, U., & Tanrıverdi, B. A. (2024). Hybridization of Concentrated Solar Thermal With Geothermal and Biomass Power. SolarPACES Conference Proceedings, 2. https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v2i.935

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Analysis and Simulation of CSP and Hybridized Systems
Received 2023-10-23
Accepted 2024-04-24
Published 2024-09-16

Funding data