Case Study on Decarbonization Strategies for LNG Export Terminals Using Heat and Power from CSP/PV Hybrid Plants

Sabrina Hasni; Werner J. Platzer

doi:10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.921

Authors

Sabrina Hasni University of Freiburg https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4100-4708
Werner J. Platzer Fraunhofer Institute for Solar Energy Systems https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6713-9064

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.921

Keywords:

Concentrated Solar Power, CSP, Liquified Natural Gas, CO2 Emission Reduction

Abstract

The race towards decarbonization is driving major oil and gas companies to explore means to use renewable heat and power for their plants as part of their commitment to reduce their carbon intensity by 80% to 100% by 2050 [1]. In terms of greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, natural gas is considered the cleanest fossil fuel option available, and decarbonization of new liquefied natural gas (LNG) projects is on the radar of many LNG projects developers. In addition, LNG cargos will have to be certified in the future by accredited authorities to meet defined GHG emission levels [2].

This research study investigates a concept of providing both heat and power from a photovoltaic (PV) and concentrated solar power (CSP) solar tower hybrid plant to meet the energy demand of LNG export terminals. Two locations have been investigated for potential future LNG projects: Karratha in Australia and Ras Laffan in Qatar. Both locations have direct normal irradiance (DNI) values higher than 2000 kWh/m²/year, which is the minimum level required for CSP technology [3]. A techno-economic assessment was carried-out taking into consideration the electricity price, the grid carbon intensity and the carbon dioxide (CO₂) tax in the region.

The results indicate that the CSP/PV hybrid plant significantly accelerates the decarbonization of energy supply to the “All electric” LNG Plant. The quantity of CO₂ emitted between 2025 and 2050 is reduced by 81% for Karratha (Australia) and by 88% for Ras Laffan (Qatar) compared to a grid connected LNG plant.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

E. Holbrook, “Shell & Eni Leading Net Zero Emissions in the Oil & Gas Industry.” https://www.environmentalleader.com/2020/05/new-research-shows-shell-and-eni-leading-the-race-to-net-zero-emissions/ (accessed May 28, 2023).

J. Stern, “Challenges to the Future of LNG: decarbonisation, affordability, and profitability,” Oxford Institute for Energy Studies. https://www.oxfordenergy.org/publications/challenges-to-the-future-of-lng-decarbonisation-affordability-and-profitability/ (accessed May 28, 2023).

K. Lovegrove and W. Stein, Eds., “Fundamental principles of concentrating solar power systems,” in Concentrating Solar Power Technology (Second Edition), 2nd ed.in Woodhead Publishing Series in Energy. Woodhead Publishing, 2021, pp. 84–93. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-819970-1.09991-6.

M. Katebah, M. Hussein, and E. I. Al-musleh, “A Straightforward Optimization Approach for a Baseload Propane-Mixed Refrigerant Process,” in Computer Aided Chemical Engineering, S. Pierucci, F. Manenti, G. L. Bozzano, and D. Manca, Eds., in 30 European Symposium on Computer Aided Process Engineering, vol. 48. Elsevier, 2020, pp. 1921–1926. doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/B978-0-12-823377-1.50321-9.

F. Li, C. Li, K. Sun, J. Zhang, and H. Li, “Capacity configuration of hybrid CSP/PV plant for economical application of solar energy,” Chinese Journal of Electrical Engineering, vol. 6, no. 2, pp. 19–29, Jun. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.23919/CJEE.2020.000008.

W. J. Platzer, “Combined solar thermal and photovoltaic power plants – An approach to 24h solar electricity?” AIP Conference Proceedings, vol. 1734, no. 1, p. 070026, May 2016, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.4949173.

W. P. Schmidt, “ARCTIC LNG PLANT DESIGN: TAKING ADVANTAGE OF THE COLD CLIMATE,” 2013. Accessed: May 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.semanticscholar.org/paper/ARCTIC-LNG-PLANT-DESIGN%3A-TAKING-ADVANTAGE-OF-THE-Schmidt/82b2cc4a572c0b8aab35a1d5e8de065ac3092b55

“JRC Photovoltaic Geographical Information System (PVGIS) - European Commission.” https://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvg_tools/en/tools.html (accessed May 28, 2023).

A. Abuzayed and N. Hartmann, “MyPyPSA-Ger: Introducing CO2 taxes on a multi-regional myopic roadmap of the German electricity system towards achieving the 1.5 °C target by 2050,” Applied Energy, vol. 310, no. C, 2022, Accessed: May 28, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://econpapers.repec.org/article/eeeappene/v_3a310_3ay_3a2022_3ai_3ac_3as0306261922000587.htm

C. | CGEP, “Levelized Cost of Carbon Abatement: An Improved Cost-Assessment Methodology for a Net-Zero Emissions World,” Center on Global Energy Policy at Columbia University | SIPA, Oct. 19, 2020. https://www.energypolicy.columbia.edu/publications/levelized-cost-carbon-abatement-improved-cost-assessment-methodology-net-zero-emissions-world/ (accessed May 28, 2023).