Performance Evaluation of a 40-kWth Prototype Counterflow Particle-sCO2 Fluidized Bed Heat Exchanger
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v2i.916Keywords:
Concentrating Solar Power, Particle Heat Exchangers, Fluidized Bed Heat TransferAbstract
Particle-sCO2 heat exchangers (HXs) can couple particle-based thermal energy storage for concentrating solar power (CSP) plants with recompression closed Brayton power cycles (RCBC) to enable continuous dispatchable renewable electricity. RCBC firing temperatures >700°C require HXs with expensive Ni-based alloys, requiring HX designs to reduce mass with high overall heat transfer coefficients UHX to meet CSP primary HX cost. To enhance UHX, mild bubbling fluidization with downward particle flows and upward fluidizing gas flows can achieve particle-wall heat transfer coefficients hT,w >800 W m-2 K-1 with CARBOBEAD HSP 40/70. To assess how high hT,w with mild particle fluidization impacts UHX, a 40-kWth particle-sCO2 HX with 12-parallel narrow-channel fluidized beds was assembled and tested to particle inlet temperatures up to 530 °C. Tests show reliable steady-state HX operation by maintaining fluidized particles in a freeboard zone above the parallel channels, but axial dispersion mixes partially cooled particles up from the fluidized channels with particles fed into the freeboard zone from the feed hopper. This mixing lowers the effective bed temperatures and the driving force for heat transfer to counterflowing sCO2 in microchannelled walls. Measured UHX based on particle inlet temperature never exceeded 205 W m-2 K-1. The trade-off between increased hT,w, and increased vertical dispersion with gas flows resulted in only small improvements in UHX after the onset of fluidization. Dispersion was incorporated into HX design and performance models that used hT,w correlations fitted to single-channel heat transfer tests. Model results show that reducing dispersion leads to higher particle wall heat transfer.
Downloads
References
[1] M. A. Reyes-Belmonte, E. Díaz, M. Romero, and J. González-Aguilar, “Particles-based thermal energy storage systems for concentrated solar power,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2033, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/1.5067215.
[2] M. Mehos et al., “Concentrating Solar Power Gen3 Demonstration Roadmap,” NrelTp-5500-67464, no. January, pp. 1–140, 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/1338899.
[3] C. S. Turchi, Z. Ma, T. W. Neises, and M. J. Wagner, “Thermodynamic study of advanced supercritical carbon dioxide power cycles for concentrating solar power systems,” J. Sol. Energy Eng. Trans. ASME, vol. 135, no. 4, 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4024030.
[4] K. J. Albrecht, H. F. Laubscher, C. P. Bowen, and C. K. Ho, “Performance Evaluation of a Prototype Moving Packed-Bed Particle / sCO 2 Heat Exchanger,” no. September 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/1887943.
[5] J. R. Fosheim, X. Hernandez, W. J. Arthur-Arhin, C. P. Bowen, K. J. Albrecht, and G. S. Jackson, “Design of a 40-kWth Counterflow Particle-Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Narrow-Channel Fluidized Bed Heat Exchanger”, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0165673.
[6] D. C. Miller, “Heat Transfer Characteristics of a Novel Fluidized Bed for Concentrating Solar with Thermal Energy Storage,” Colorado School of Mines, Golden, CO, 2017.
[7] J. R. Fosheim, X. Hernandez, J. Abraham, A. Thompson, B. Jesteadt, and G. S. Jackson, “Narrow-channel fluidized beds for particle-sCO2 heat exchangers in next generation CPS plants,” AIP Conf. Proc., vol. 2445, no. 1, p. 160007, May 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1063/5.0085934.
[8] O. Molerus, “Particle-to-gas heat transfer in particle beds at Peclet numbers Pe ≤ 10,” Powder Technol., vol. 90, no. 1, pp. 47–51, 1997, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(96)03197-X.
[9] Arthur-Arhin, W., Fosheim, J. R., Brewster, K. J., Thompson, A., Albrecht, K. J., Amogne, D., & Jackson, G. S. (2022). Testing of a 40-kWth Counterflow Particle-Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Narrow-Channel, Fluidized Bed Heat Exchanger. In SolarPACES Conference Proceedings (Vol. 1), doi: https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.634.
[10] K.J. Brewster, J. R. Fosheim, F. Municchi, W.J. Arthur-Arhin, G.S. Jackson, "Reduced-Order Modeling of Indirect Fluidized-Bed Particle Receivers with Axial Dispersion”, submitted for publication AIP Proceedings, presented at SolarPACES 2023.
[11] M.-S. Salehi, M. Askarishahi, and S. Radl, “Quantification of Solid Mixing in Bubbling Fluidized Beds via Two-Fluid Model Simulations,” Ind. Eng. Chem. Res., vol. 59, no. 22, pp. 10606–10621, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.iecr.9b06343.
[12] N. Mostoufi and J. Chaouki, “Local solid mixing in gas–solid fluidized beds,” Powder Technol., vol. 114, no. 1–3, pp. 23–31, Jan. 2001, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0032-5910(00)00258-8.
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Winfred Arthur-Arhin, Jesse R. Fosheim, Keaton J. Brewster, Kevin J Albrecht, Dimitri A. Madden, Gregory S. Jackson
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2024-06-27
Published 2024-11-20