Hydrogen Production via Off-Sun Solar-Thermal Supercritical Water Gasification and Membrane Reforming of Piggery Waste

Louise Bardwell; Alireza Rahbari; John Pye

doi:10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.748

Authors

Louise Bardwell Australian National University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9933-4585
Alireza Rahbari Australian National University https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6363-739X
John Pye Australian National University

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.748

Keywords:

Supercritical Water Gasification, Off-Sun, Membrane Reforming, Hydrogen, Solar Fuel

Abstract

Supercritical water gasification (SCWG) represents an emerging technology for liquid fuel synthesis, offering large potential in significantly improving the efficiency and environmental impact of clean fuel production. Compared to conventional gasification, SCWG proceeds at much lower temperatures, allowing char and tar-free gasification of biomass and for low-quality and high-moisture content biomass to be used. As the thermochemical processes involved in SCWG and steam methane reforming (SMR) are highly endothermic, combining them with concentrated solar power (CSP) and thermal energy storage (TES) could allow the process to be driven solely by renewable energy. As such, this work models an off-sun SCWG/SMR system using novel molten salt, proposed to reach up to 600°C [1], which overcomes the previously limiting molten salt temperature of 550°C. Using an off-sun configuration, it deals with the on-sun configuration’s issues of degraded lifetime and creep-fatigue, allowing for uniform heating and a reduced load on the reactors. The novel technology of an integrated Pd-based membrane reactor, highly selective to H₂, was chosen given its ability to carry out SMR at temperatures in the viable range of new molten salts. The system uses a waste feedstock, piggery waste, to provide the dual benefit of reducing the environmental cost associated with piggery waste’s release of CH₄. From the model created in Aspen Plus, a plant output of 7.2 kmolH₂/h (1,135 Nm³/h of H₂), was obtained with a flow rate of 150 kg/h of dry piggery waste, a membrane area of 131.8 m², and a 73% CH₄ conversion from the feed.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Giaconia, M. d. Falco, G. Caputo, R. Grena, P. Tarquini, and L. Marrelli, “Solar steam reforming of natural gas for hydrogen production using molten salt heat carriers,” AIChE Journal, vol. 54, no. 7, pp. 1932–1944, 2008. doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/aic.11510.

IPCC, Ed., “Summary for Policymakers,” in Global Warming of 1.5°C: IPCC Special Report on Impacts of Global Warming of 1.5°C above Preindustrial Levels in Context of Strengthening Response to Climate Change, Sustainable Development, and Efforts to Eradicate Poverty, Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2022, pp. 1–24, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.04.001.

V. S. Sikarwar, M. Zhao, P. S. Fennell, N. Shah, and E. J. Anthony, “Progress in biofuel production from gasification,” Progress in Energy and Combustion Science, vol. 61, pp. 189–248, Jul. 2017, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pecs.2017.04.001.

A. Bonk, M. Braun, A. Hanke, V.A. Sötz, T. Bauer, AIP Conference Proceedings 2303 (2020) 190003.

A. Rahbari, A. Shirazi, and J. Pye, “Methanol fuel production from solar-assisted supercritical water gasification of algae: a techno-economic annual optimisation,” Sustainable Energy Fuels, vol. 5, no. 19, pp. 4913–4931, Sep. 2021.

A. Rahbari, M. B. Venkataraman, and J. Pye, “Energy and exergy analysis of concentrated solar supercritical water gasification of algal biomass,” Applied Energy, vol. 228, pp. 1669–1682, Oct. 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2018.07.002.

A. Rahbari, A. Shirazi, M. B. Venkataraman, and J. Pye, “A solar fuel plant via supercritical water gasification integrated with Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: Steady-state modelling and techno-economic assessment,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 184, pp. 636–648, Mar. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.01.033.

A. Shirazi, A. Rahbari, C.-A. Asselineau, and J. Pye, “A solar fuel plant via supercritical water gasification integrated with Fischer–Tropsch synthesis: System-level dynamic simulation and optimisation,” Energy Conversion and Management, vol. 192, pp. 71–87, Jul. 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2019.04.008.

A. Rahbari, A. Shirazi, M. B. Venkataraman, and J. Pye, “Solar fuels from supercritical water gasification of algae: Impacts of low-cost hydrogen on reformer configurations,” Applied Energy, vol. 288, p. 116620, Apr. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2021.116620.

M. B. Venkataraman, A. Rahbari, P. van Eyk, A. W. Weimer, W. Lipiński, and J. Pye, “Liquid fuel production via supercritical water gasification of algae: a role for solar heat integration?,” Sustainable Energy Fuels, vol. 5, no. 24, pp. 6269–6297, Dec. 2021, doi: https://doi.org/10.1039/D1SE01615F.

A. Giaconia, G. Iaquaniello, G. Caputo, B. Morico, A. Salladini, L. Turchetti, G. Monteleone, A. Giannini, and E. Palo, “Experimental validation of a pilot membrane reactor for hydrogen production by solar steam reforming of methane at maximum 550 °C using molten salts as heat transfer fluid,” International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, vol. 45, no. 58, pp. 33 088–33 101, Nov. 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijhydene.2020.09.070.

F.A.O. of the United Nations, “Global Livestock Environmental Assessment Model (GLEAM),” 2020.

Australian Government, “Animal effluent management method,” 2021.

M. Sharara and S. Sadaka, “Thermogravimetric Analysis of Swine Manure Solids Obtained from Farrowing, and Growing-Finishing Farms,” Journal of Sustainable Bioenergy Systems, vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 75–86, Mar. 2014, number: 1 Publisher: Scientific Research Publishing, doi: https://doi.org/10.4236/jsbs.2014.41008.

W.-D. Steinmann, “Thermal energy storage systems for concentrating solar power (csp) plants,” in Concentrating solar power technology: Principles, developments and applications. Woodhead Publishing Limited, pp. 16–25.

D. Castello and L. Fiori, “Supercritical water gasification of biomass: Thermodynamic constraints,” Bioresource Technology, vol. 102, no. 16, pp. 7574–7582, Aug. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biortech.2011.05.017.

O. Yakaboylu, J. Harinck, K. G. Gerton Smit, and W. de Jong, “Supercritical water gasification of manure: A thermodynamic equilibrium modeling approach,” Biomass and Bioenergy, vol. 59, pp. 253–263, Dec. 2013, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.biombioe.2013.07.011.

N. A. Al-Mufachi, N. V. Rees, and R. Steinberger-Wilkens, “Hydrogen selective membranes: A review of palladium-based dense metal membranes,” Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, vol. 47, pp. 540–551, Jul. 2015, doi: 10.1016/j.rser.2015.03.026.

Biofuels Research Infrastructure (BRISK). “Phyllis2.” https://phyllis.nl/ (Sep. 2021)

S. M. Heilmann et al., “Phosphorus Reclamation through Hydrothermal Carbonization of Animal Manures,” Environ. Sci. Technol., vol. 48, no. 17, pp. 10323–10329, Sep. 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/es501872k.

X. Cao, K. S. Ro, M. Chappell, Y. Li, and J. Mao, “Chemical Structures of Swine-Manure Chars Produced under Different Carbonization Conditions Investigated by Advanced Solid-State 13C Nuclear Magnetic Resonance (NMR) Spectroscopy,” Energy Fuels, vol. 25, no. 1, pp. 388–397, Jan. 2011, doi: https://doi.org/10.1021/ef101342v.