Evaluating H2 Infiltration via Drone-Based Thermal Imaging
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/solarpaces.v1i.710Keywords:
Parabolic Trough, Receiver, Heat Collection Element (HCE), HydrogenAbstract
This work discusses the analysis of thermal survey data from operating parabolic trough plants. A thermal survey consists of IR images of individual HCEs in a parabolic trough collector, these images are the basis of a non-intrusive methodology for evaluating the heat losses. The HCE performance is affected by issues such as H2 infiltration and lost vacuum, which are difficult to identify visually but significantly increase the heat losses. In this work the glass temperatures from survey data are compared to predictions from a reduced order model of the HCE with good agreement. The model is then used for parametric studies looking at the variation of important ambient conditions, glass envelope conditions, and optical properties. Results indicate the model is a useful and computationally efficient tool to determine the status of a given HCE; however, it can be difficult to distinguish between lost vacuum (from outside air infiltration), and certain levels of H2 infiltration (from decomposition of the HTF). The main methodology for identifying H2 infiltration in these cases involves thermal surveying at different times of the day, taking advantage of the temperature dependence of the getter capacity.
Downloads
References
M. Mehos et al., “Concentrating Solar Power Best Practices Study,” Golden, CO, United States, 2020, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75763.pdf. doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/1665767.
H. Price et al., “Field survey of parabolic trough receiver thermal performance,” International Solar Energy Conference, 2006, vol. 3, pp. 1075–1082.
G. Glatzmaier, “Development of Hydrogen Mitigation for the Nevada Solar One Power Plant,” Golden, CO, United States, 2020, https://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy20osti/75127.pdf.4.
R. Forristall, “Heat Transfer Analysis and Modeling of a Parabolic Trough Solar Receiver Implemented in Engineering Equation Solver,” Golden, CO, United States, 2003. doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/15004820.
S. M. Akbarimoosavi and M. Yaghoubi, “3D thermal-structural analysis of an absorber tube of a parabolic trough collector and the effect of tube deflection on optical efficiency,” Energy Procedia, vol. 49, pp. 2433–2443, 2014, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2014.03.258.
D. Lei, X. Fu, Y. Ren, F. Yao, and Z. Wang, “Temperature and thermal stress analysis of parabolic trough receivers,” Renew. Energy, vol. 136, pp. 403–413, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.renene.2019.01.021.
F. Burkholder and C. F. Kutscher, “Heat loss testing of Schott’s 2008 PTR70 parabolic trough receiver,” 2009, http://www.nrel.gov/docs/fy09osti/45633.pdf, doi: https://doi.org/10.2172/1369635.
F. Burkholder et al. “The test and prediction of argon-hydrogen and xenon-hydrogen heat conduction in parabolic trough receivers,” Proceedings of SolarPACES Conference, Granada, Spain, 2011
J. A. Duffie & W. A. Beckman, “Selected Heat Transfer Topics,” in Solar Engineering of Thermal Processes, 4th ed. Hoboken, NJ, United States: Wiley, 2013, ch. 3, sec. 1, pp 138-172
System Advisor Model Version 2021.12.02 (2021.12.02). SSC source code. National Renewable Energy Laboratory. Golden, CO. https://github.com/NREL/ssc
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Luca Imponenti, Keith Boyle, Ryan Shininger, Tim Wendelin, Hank Price
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Funding data
-
Small Business Innovation Research and Small Business Technology Transfer
Grant numbers DE-SC0021852