Improving the Accuracy of PV Yield Calculation by Exploitation of Real Weather Data

Andreas Schneider; Matthias Buschmann; Jorge Rabanal-Arabach; Julia Chochollek; Thomas Nierhoff

doi:10.52825/siliconpv.v2i.1296

Authors

Andreas Schneider University of Applied Sciences Gelsenkirchen https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3574-8265
Matthias Buschmann University of Applied Sciences Gelsenkirchen https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0661-3701
Jorge Rabanal-Arabach University of Antofagasta https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9234-2598
Julia Chochollek University of Applied Sciences Gelsenkirchen https://orcid.org/0009-0008-0017-8614
Thomas Nierhoff University of Applied Sciences Gelsenkirchen

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/siliconpv.v2i.1296

Keywords:

Photovoltaic Module, Temperature Coefficients, Field Measurement

Abstract

The precision of yield calculation of modern design and simulation software for photovoltaic systems strongly rely, beside the accuracy of the specified module and inverter data, on the quality of the weather data. Since data from weather stations is not available for most locations world-wide this data is calculated by using modern interpolation methods. Beside this, simulation software typically uses historical weather data. In this work the mismatch of yield simulation results based on proprietary data, meaning interpolated or also called synthetical data, and data coming from a weather station in proximity to the installation is evaluated. The simulated data sets are compared to measurement data as obtained by the inverter output and hence give a profound understanding how interpolated data may influence the simulation results. The outcome shows that the quality of the yield simulation, if compared to the measurement data, is increased by a factor of up to four if on-site weather data is used as input for the simulation. The largest source of deviation is irradiation, which varies up to 10% if synthetical and measured irradiation on-site is compared. The second largest sources for simulation mismatches are power calculation and module temperature correction.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

[1] D. Milosavljević, T. S. Kevkić, and S. J. Jovanović, “Review and validation of photovoltaic solar simulation tools/software based on case study“, Open Physics 2022; 20: 431–451.

[2] G. Bender, S. Pelland, and L. L., Vaisala, “Comparing photovoltaic yield prediction from synthetic weather years to those from hourly time series“, Vaisala Energy, 2017.

[3] A. Migan-Dubois, J. Badosa, F. C. Obaldía, O. Atlan, V. Bourdin, M. Pavlov, D. Y. Kim, Y. Bonnassieux, “Step-by-step evaluation of photovoltaic module performance related to outdoor parameters: evaluation of the uncertainty“, 44th IEEE Photovoltaic Specialists Conference (IEEE-PVSC), Jun 2017, Washington, United States. pp.626-631, https://doi.org/10.1109/PVSC.2017.8366615.

[4] M. Zouine, M. Akhsassi, N. Erraissi, N. Aarich, A. Bennouna, M. Raoufi, A. Outzourhit, “Mathematical models calculating PV module temperature using weather data: Experimental study“, Lecture Notes in Electrical Engineering 519:630-639, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-1405-6_72, April 2018

[5] B. Müller, L. Hardt, A. Armbruster, K. Kiefer, C. Reise, “Yield predictions for photovoltaic power plants: empirical validation, recent advances and remaining uncertainties“, Progress in Photovoltaics Research and Applications 24(4):570–583, 2016, DOI:https://doi.org/10.1002/pip.2616