Simulation-Based Origin-Destination Matrix Reduction: A Case Study of Helsinki City Area
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v4i.197Keywords:
Origin-destination matrix estimation, Traffic demand model, Urban mobility, Data-driven traffic simulation, SUMOAbstract
Estimation of a travel demand in a form of origin-destination (OD) matrix is a necessary step in a city-scale simulation of the vehicular mobility. However, an input data on travel demand in OD matrix may be available only for a specific set of traffic assignment zones (TAZs). Thus, there appears a need to infer OD matrix for a region of interest (we call it ‘core’ area) given OD matrix for a larger region (we call it ‘extended’ area), which is challenging as trip counts are only given for zones of the initial region. To perform a reduction, we explicitly simulate vehicle trajectories for the extended area and supplement trip values in ‘core’ TAZs based on the recorded trajectories on the border of core and extended areas. To keep validation results consistent between extended and core simulations, we introduce edge-based origin-destination assignment algorithm which preserves properties of traffic flows on the border of the core area but also keeps randomness in instantiating simulation for the core area.
The experimental study is performed for Helsinki city area using Simulation of Urban MObility (SUMO) tool. The validation was performed using DigiTraffic data from traffic counting stations within the city area for workdays of autumn 2018. Validation results show that the reduced OD matrix combined with edge-based OD assignment algorithm keeps the simulated traffic counts in good agreement with results from the extended area simulation with average MAPE between observed and simulated traffic counts equal to 34%. Simulation time after reduction is equal to 20 minutes compared to 6 hours for the extended OD.
Downloads
References
J. A. Sánchez-Vaquerizo, “Getting Real: The Challenge of Building and Validating a Large-Scale Digital Twin of Barcelona’s Traffic with Empirical Data,” ISPRS Int J Geoinf, vol. 11, no. 1, Jan. 2022, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010024. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010024
M. Behrisch, L. Bieker, J. Erdmann, and D. Krajzewicz, “SUMO – Simulation of Urban MObility: An Overview,” in Proceedings of SIMUL 2011, The Third International Con-ference on Advances in System Simulation, Oct. 2011, pp. 23–28.
“SUMO Helsinki city traffic model, github repository”. https://github.com/helsinki-sda-group/sumo-hki-cm (04.04.2023).
C. Zhu, J. Wu, and A. Kouvelas, “Demand estimation and spatio-temporal clustering for urban road networks,” in 9th Symposium of the European Association for Re-search in Transportation (hEART 2020), 2020, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.3929/ethz-b-000456499.
S. Uppoor and M. Fiore, “Large-scale urban vehicular mobility for networking re-search,” in 2011 IEEE Vehicular Networking Conference (VNC), Nov. 2011, pp. 62–69. doi: https://www.doi.org/10.1109/VNC.2011.6117125. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/VNC.2011.6117125
P. C. E. Bouchard R. J., “Use of gravity model for describing urban travel,” Highway Research Record, vol. 88, p. 5, 1965.
I. Ekowicaksono, F. Bukhari, and A. Aman, “Estimating Origin-Destination Matrix of Bogor City Using Gravity Model,” IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci, vol. 31, p. 012021, Jan. 2016, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/31/1/012021. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/31/1/012021
H. Yu, S. Zhu, J. Yang, Y. Guo, and T. Tang, “A Bayesian Method for Dynamic Origin–Destination Demand Estimation Synthesizing Multiple Sources of Data,” Sen-sors, vol. 21, no. 15, p. 4971, Jul. 2021, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.3390/s21154971. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3390/s21154971
X. Zhou, X. Qin, and H. S. Mahmassani, “Dynamic Origin-Destination Demand Esti-mation with Multiday Link Traffic Counts for Planning Applications,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, vol. 1831, no. 1, pp. 30–38, Jan. 2003, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.3141/1831-04. DOI: https://doi.org/10.3141/1831-04
A. Abadi, T. Rajabioun, and P. A. Ioannou, “Traffic Flow Prediction for Road Transpor-tation Networks With Limited Traffic Data,” IEEE Transactions on Intelligent Transpor-tation Systems, pp. 1–10, 2014, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2337238. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/TITS.2014.2337238
X. Zhou, S. Erdogan, and H. S. Mahmassani, “Dynamic Origin-Destination Trip De-mand Estimation for Subarea Analysis,” Transportation Research Record: Journal of the Transportation Research Board, pp. 176–184, 2006, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.1177/0361198106196400119 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0361198106196400119
M. Behrisch and P. Hartwig, “A comparison of SUMO’s count based and countless demand generation tools,” SUMO Conference Proceedings, vol. 2, pp. 125–131, Jun. 2022, doi: https://www.doi.org/10.52825/scp.v2i.107. DOI: https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v2i.107
“HSL Helmet model”, https://github.com/HSLdevcom/helmet-ui (04.04.2023).
“Digitraffic data”, https://www.digitraffic.fi/en/road-traffic/lam/ (04.04.2023).
McNally M. G., The four-step model. Emerald Group Publishing Limited, 2007. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/9780857245670-003
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Klavdiya Bochenina, Anton Taleiko, Laura Ruotsalainen
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 3.0 Unported License.
Funding data
-
Academy of Finland
Grant numbers Project 347197