Comparing and Parameterizing the Electrical Energy Consumption Models in SUMO

Authors

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v5i.1012

Keywords:

Battery Model, Parameterization of PHEMlight

Abstract

This paper examined the performances of the current four battery models in SUMO. The possibility of expanding the model parameterization was also investigated and the corresponding extension was carried out for PHEMlight. Accordingly, the models can be compared more fairly. Three scenarios were used, namely the Worldwide harmonized Light vehicles Test Cycle, a constant high-speed highway scenario and an area scenario with a relatively complex traffic situation. The results show that all models can address recuperation and propulsion, and deliver the similar result at very low acceleration. The models based on average vehicle data generally tend to deliver higher battery consumption than the models with individual vehicle type-specific parameterization, especially PHEMlight5, while HBEFA4 only has one electric vehicle class and is therefore not sensitive to various vehicle characteristics. Moreover, the model by Kurczveil and López (EVM) seems to tend to have the lowest consumption of all models.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

VIRTA. “The global electric vehicle market overview in 2024: Statistics & forecasts.” (2023), [Online]. Available: https://www.virta.global/en/global-electric-vehicle-market (visited on 02/05/2024).

J. Pontes. “World EV sales – Tesla model 3 wins 4th Consecutive Best Seller Title in Record Year.” (2022), [Online]. Available: https://cleantechnica.com/2022/01/30/world-ev-sales-tesla-model-3-wins-4th-consecutive-best-seller-title-in- record-year/ (visited on 02/18/2024).

N. Reininghaus, M. Kroener, T. Schneider, et al., “Presenting the project sekquasens3: Combining a networked sensor concept with model-based decisions for optimized energy flow in a district,” in 7th E-Mobility Power System Integration Symposium (EMOB 2023), 2023, pp. 176–181. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1049/icp.2023.2701.

D. Krajzewicz, M. Behrisch, P. Wagner, R. Luz, and M. Krumnow, “Second generation of pollutant emission models for SUMO,” in Modeling Mobility with Open Data, M. Behrisch and M. Weber, Eds., Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2015, pp. 203–221. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-15024-6_12.

S. Hausberger and D. Krajzewicz, “Colombo: Deliverable 4.2: Extended simulation tool PHEM coupled to SUMO with user guide,” European Commission, Tech. Rep., 2015. [Online]. Available: https://web.archive.org/web/20170606005527/http://elib.dlr.de/98047/1/COLOMBO_D4.2_ExtendedPHEMSUMO_v1.7.pdf.

T. Kurczveil and E. Schnieder, “Implementation of an energy model and a charging infrastructure in SUMO,” in Proceedings of the 1st SUMO User Conference SUMO 2013, M. Behrisch and M. Knocke, Eds., Berlin: The Institute of Transportation Systems, German Aerospace Center, 2013, pp. 88–94. [Online]. Available: https://elib.dlr.de/93885/1/Proceeding_SUMO2013_15-17May%202013_Berlin-Adlershof.pdf.

L. Koch, D. S. Buse, M. Wegener, et al., “Accurate physics-based modeling of electric vehicle energy consumption in the SUMO traffic microsimulator,” in 2021 IEEE International Intelligent Transportation Systems Conference (ITSC), 2021, pp. 1650–1657. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ITSC48978.2021.9564463.

SUMO. “Emissions.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Models/Emissions.html (visited on 02/23/2024).

ITNA. “PHEM.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://www.itna.tugraz.at/en/research/areas/em/simulation/phem.html (visited on 02/23/2024).

SUMO. “HBEFA4-based.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://sumo.dlr.de/docs/Models/Emissions/HBEFA4-based.html (visited on 02/23/2024).

TUMFTM. “Electric Machine Design.” (2024), [Online]. Available: https://github.com/TUMFTM/Electric_Machine_Design (visited on 02/23/2024).

U. Nations. “Addendum 15: Global technical regulation no. 15 - worldwide harmonized light vehicles test procedure.” (2014), [Online]. Available: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/main/wp29/wp29r- 1998agr- rules/ECE- TRANS- 180a15e.pdf (visited on 05/10/2024).

I. Riemersma, “Technical report on the development of a world-wide worldwide harmonised light duty driving test procedure (wltp) - informal document no. grpe-72-02-un/ece/wp.29/grpe/wltp-ig - final version,” Sidekick Project Support, Tech. Rep., 2015. [Online]. Available: https://unece.org/fileadmin/DAM/trans/doc/2015/wp29grpe/GRPE-72-02.pdf.

J. Finnerty. “What common things drain your electric car battery and by how much?” (2023), [Online]. Available: https://www.gridserve.com/2023/05/18/what-common-things-drain-your-electric-car-battery-and-by-how-much/ (visited on 02/23/2024).

Downloads

Published

2024-07-17

How to Cite

Behrisch, M., Flötteröd, Y.-P., & Wagner, P. (2024). Comparing and Parameterizing the Electrical Energy Consumption Models in SUMO. SUMO Conference Proceedings, 5, 1–16. https://doi.org/10.52825/scp.v5i.1012

Conference Proceedings Volume

Section

Conference papers
Received 2024-01-15
Accepted 2024-04-03
Published 2024-07-17