Renewable Hydrogen Supply Scenarios for Inland Waterway Transport in Europe
Assessment of GHG Emissions and Costs
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/isec.v1i.1238Keywords:
Renewable Hydrogen, Well-to-Tank Assessment, Techno-Economic AnalysisAbstract
The European inland waterway transport needs to substitute 6.2 TWh of fossil diesel by renewable energy carriers. For hydrogen retrofit solutions investigated in the European project “Synergetics”, different Well-to-Tank pathways have been analysed to supply renewable hydrogen to Rotterdam, including buffer storage and fuelling to vessels. This paper compares two dominant scenarios with regards to GHG emissions and costs. One scenario is based on PV electricity from Morocco, transported to Rotterdam for electrolysis. The other scenario is calculated with electricity from offshore wind farms in the Northern Sea. The calculation of the PV scenario leads to specific emissions for the hydrogen supplied to vessels of 51 gCO2eq/kWhH2 with levelized costs of hydrogen of 0.12 €/kWhH2. The wind scenario led to 16 gCO2eq/kWhH2 with 0.19 €/kWhH2. The electrolysis has the highest impact on emissions and costs, especially the electricity demand. Accordingly, lower emissions of PV electricity supply would have a high influence on the overall results. On the other hand, for the low emission renewable hydrogen supply with wind power a further reduction of the costs of the installation will be relevant.
Downloads
References
F. Dahlke-Wallat, B. Friedhoff, S. Martens, ” Assessment of technologies in view of zero-emission IWT”, Edition 2 (May 2021), https://www.ccr-zkr.org/files/documents/EtudesTransEner/Deliverable_RQ_C_Edition2.pdf, last assessed on 14.03.2024
CCNR, “Inland navigation in Europe – Market observation“,September 2023, https://www.ccr-zkr.org/files/documents/om/om23_II_en.pdf, last assessed on 14.03.2024
U. Kramer, D. Bothe, C. Gatzen, M. Reger, M. Lothmann, F. Duennebeil, K. Biemann, A. Liebich, M. Dittrich, S. Limberger, M. Rosental, T. Fröhlich: FVV Future Fuels Study IV - The Transformation of Mobility to the GHG-neutral Post-fossil Age, 2021.
A. Liebich, T. Frohlich, D. Münter: System comparison of storable energy carriers from renewable energies, 2021, available online at https://www.umweltbundesamt.de/publikationen/system-comparison-of-storable-energy-carriers-from, last assessed on 20.10.2023.
M.R. Usman: Hydrogen storage methods: Review and current status. In Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews 167, 2022, p. 112743. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2022.112743.
R. van Rossum, J. Jaro, G. La Guardia, A. Wang, L. Kühnen, ;. Overgaag: European Hydrogen Backbone: A European Hydrogen Infrastructure Vision Covering 28 Countries. European Hydrogen Backbone, 2022, https://www.ehb.eu/files/downloads/ehb-report-220428-17h00-interactive-1.pdf, accessed on 11.03.2023.
GEMIS: Globales Emissions-Modell integrierter Systeme. Edited by IINAS - Internationales Institut für Nachhaltigkeitsanalysen und -strategien, 2022, Available online at https://iinas.org/arbeit/gemis/, last assessed on 23.11.2023.
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Elimar Frank, Luca Stauss
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.