Of Innovators, Enablers and Change Agents: Disentangling Actors and Their Roles in Agri-Food Transition Processes
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/gjae.v73i3.1114Keywords:
Transformation, Sustainability, Organic Agriculture, Organic Model Region, Multi-Actor Perspective, Social Ecological InventoryAbstract
The urgent need for a fundamental change within agri-food systems, driven by the critical challenge of surpassing planetary boundaries, necessitates a comprehensive understanding of the actors and their roles in transition processes. This study addresses a significant knowledge gap by exploring the dynamics of actor interactions and the multifaceted roles they play in facilitating or hindering the transition towards more sustainable agri-food systems. Focusing on the Bio-Musterregion Heidenheim plus in Baden-Württemberg, Germany, as a case study, data were collected using the Social Ecological Inventory method. As a theoretical framework, the study was based on the multi-actor perspective. Altogether 157 actors and numerous roles were identified. Key findings refute the assumption that an actor inherently has a fixed role. We also show that roles are dynamic and can change over time. Furthermore, actors can take on multiple roles simultaneously. We conclude that a nuanced understanding of actor dynamics and their evolving roles is crucial for managing sustainability transitions. Efforts need to be directed towards supporting networking and knowledge sharing between niche actors. Equally important is the transfer of initiatives and knowledge from the niche level to the regime level, which may be achieved by empowering change agents in the political sphere.
Downloads
References
Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J.M. (2016): Shifting power relations in sustainability transitions: A multi-actor perspective. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning 18(5): 628-649. https://doi.org/10.1080/1523908X.2015.1112259.
Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J. (2018): Transformative social innovation and its multi-actor nature. Atlas of Social Innovation–New Practices for a Better Future. In: Howaldt, J., Kaletka, C., Schröder, A., Zirngiebl, M. (eds.): Sozialforschungsstelle Dortmund. TU Dortmund: 47-50. https://www.socialinnovationatlas.net/fileadmin/PDF/einzeln/01_SI-Landscape_Global_Trends/01_09_Transformative-SI-Multi-Actor-Nature_Avelino-Wittmayer.pdf.
Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J.M. (2019): The transformative potential of plural social enterprise. Theory of Social Enterprise and Pluralism: 193-221. https://doi.org/10.4324/9780429291197-10.
Baird, J., Plummer, R., Pickering, K. (2014): Priming the governance system for climate change adaptation: The application of a social-ecological inventory to engage actors in Niagara, Canada. Ecology and Society 19 (1): art3. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-06152-190103.
Barbanente, A., Grassini, L. (2022): Fostering transitions in landscape policies: A multi-level perspective. Land Use Policy 112: 105869. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.LANDUSEPOL.2021.105869.
Bellon, S., Lamine, C. (2009): Conversion to organic farming: A multidimensional research object at the crossroads of agricultural and social sciences - A review. In: Lichtfouse, E., Navarrete, M., Debaeke, P., Véronique, S., Alberola, C. (eds.): Sustainable Agriculture. Springer, Dordrecht: 653-672. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-90-481-2666-8_40.
Biddle, B.J. (1986): Recent developments in role theory. Annual Review of Sociology 12(1): 67-92. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.12.080186.000435.
BMEL (2021): Ackerbaustrategie 2035 Perspektiven für einen produktiven und vielfältigen Pflanzenbau. https://www.bmel.de/DE/themen/landwirtschaft/pflanzenbau/ackerbau/ackerbaustrategie.html.
Bodenheimer, M., Dütschke, E. (2021): Lost in transition? Disentangling agency, activities and actor roles. In: International Sustainability Transitions Conference 2021. https://doi.org/10.24406/publica-73.
Böröcz, J., Southworth, C. (1998): “Who you know” earnings effects of formal and informal social network resources under late state socialism in Hungary, 1986-1987. The Journal of Socio-Economics 27 (3): 401-425. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1053-5357(99)80096-1.
Brown, R.R., Farrelly, M.A., Loorbach, D.A. (2013): Actors working the institutions in sustainability transitions: The case of Melbourne’s stormwater management. Global Environmental Change 23 (4): 701-718. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.013.
Bünger, A. (2018): Die Bedeutung von regionalen Innovationspotenzialen und Nachhaltigkeitsorientierung für eine sozio-technische Transformation in der Agrar- und Ernährungswirtschaft. Dissertation. Universität Greifswald.
Callero, P.L. (1994): From role-playing to role-using: Understanding role as resource. Social Psychology Quarterly 57 (3): 228. https://doi.org/10.2307/2786878.
Campbell, B.M., Beare, D.J., Bennett, E.M., Hall-Spencer, J.M., Ingram, J.S.I., Jaramillo, F., Ortiz, R., Ramankutty, N., Sayer, J.A., Shindell, D. (2017): Agriculture production as a major driver of the Earth system exceeding planetary boundaries. Ecology and Society 22 (4): art8. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09595-220408.
Darnhofer, I., Schneeberger, W., Freyer, B. (2005): Converting or not converting to organic farming in Austria: Farmer types and their rationale. Agriculture and Human Values 22 (1): 39-52. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10460-004-7229-9.
de Haan, J.H., Rotmans, J. (2011): Patterns in transitions: Understanding complex chains of change. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 78 (1): 90-102. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2010.10.008.
Deutsche Bundesregierung. (2021): Deutsche Nachhaltigkeitsstrategie 2021. https://www.zukunftsstadt-stadtlandplus.de/news-details/deutsche-nachhaltigkeitsstrategie-2021-beschlossen-und-veroeffentlicht.html.
Diaz, M., Darnhofer, I., Darrot, C., Beuret, J.E. (2013): Green tides in Brittany: What can we learn about niche-regime interactions? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 8: 62-75. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.EIST.2013.04.002.
Dresing, T., Pehl, T. (2018): Praxisbuch Interview, Transkription & Analyse. Anleitungen und Regelsysteme für qualitativ Forschende. 8. Auflage. https://www.audiotranskription.de/download/praxisbuch_transkription.pdf?q=Praxisbuch-Transkription.pdf.
El Bilali, H. (2020): Transition heuristic frameworks in research on agro-food sustainability transitions. Environment, Development and Sustainability 22 (3): 1693-1728. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-018-0290-0.
European Commission (2020): ‘Farm to fork’ strategy for a fair, healthy and environmentally friendly food system. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/EN/legal-content/summary/farm-to-fork-strategy-for-a-fair-healthy-and-environmentally-friendly-food-system.html.
European Commission (2021): Common agricultural policy 2023-2027. https://www.consilium.europa.eu/de/policies/cap-introduction/cap-future-2020-common-agricultural-policy-2023-2027/.
Farla, J., Markard, J., Raven, R., Coenen, L. (2012): Sustainability transitions in the making: A closer look at actors, strategies and resources. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 79 (6): 991-998. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2012.02.001.
Felt, U., Igelsböck, J., Schikowitz, A., Völker, T. (2012): Challenging participation in sustainability research. International Journal of Deliberative Mechanisms in Science 1 (1): 4-43. https://doi.org/10.4471/demesci.2012.01.
Newig, J., Fischer, L.B. (2016): Importance of actors and agency in sustainability transitions: A systematic exploration of the literature. Sustainability 8 (5): 476. https://doi.org/10.3390/su8050476.
Forum Ernährung Heidenheim (2021): Entdecke den Ess-Genuss in der Heimat. https://heidenheim.landwirtschaft-bw.de/,Lde/Startseite/Forum+Ernaehrung/Direktvermarktung.
Fuchs, G. (2014): The role of local initiatives in transforming the german energy supply system. GAIA - Ecological Perspectives for Science and Society 23 (2): 135-136. https://doi.org/10.14512/GAIA.23.2.15.
Geels, F.W. (2002): Technological transitions as evolutionary reconfiguration processes: a multi-level perspective and a case-study. Research Policy 31 (8-9): 1257-1274. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0048-7333(02)00062-8.
Geels, F.W. (2011): The multi-level perspective on sustainability transitions: Responses to seven criticisms. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 1 (1): 24-40. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2011.02.002.
Geels, F.W., Schot, J. (2007): Typology of sociotechnical transition pathways. Research Policy 36 (3): 399-417. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2007.01.003.
Geels, F.W., Schot, J. (2010): The dynamics of transitions: A socio-technical perspective. In Transitions to Sustainable Development: New directions in the Study of Long Term Transformative Change (January). https://www.researchgate.net/publication/273697987.
Genus, A., Coles, A.-M. (2008): Rethinking the multi-level perspective of technological transitions. Research Policy 37 (9): 1436-1445. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2008.05.006.
Hargreaves, T., Hielscher, S., Seyfang, G., Smith, A. (2013): Grassroots innovations in community energy: The role of intermediaries in niche development. Global Environmental Change 23 (5): 868-880. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2013.02.008.
Hölscher, K., Avelino, F., Wittmayer, J.M. (2018a): Empowering actors in transition management in and for cities: 131-158. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-69273-9_6.
Hölscher, K., Wittmayer, J.M., Loorbach, D. (2018b): Transition versus transformation: What’s the difference? Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 27: 1-3. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2017.10.007.
Hossain, M. (2016): Grassroots innovation: A systematic review of two decades of research. Journal of Cleaner Production 137: 973-981. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.07.140.
Jørgensen, U. (2012): Mapping and navigating transitions - The multi-level perspective compared with arenas of development. Research Policy 41 (6): 996-1010. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.RESPOL.2012.03.001.
Kallas, Z., Serra, T., Gil, J.M. (2010): Farmers’ objectives as determinants of organic farming adoption: the case of Catalonian vineyard production. Agricultural Economics 41 (5): 409-423. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1574-0862.2010.00454.x.
Landratsamt Heidenheim (n.d.): Bio-Musterregion Heidenheim plus. Retrieved February 23, 2024. https://www.landkreis-heidenheim.de/landkreis/bio-musterregion+heidenheim+plus.
LEL (Landesanstalt für Landwirtschaft, Ernährung und Ländlichen Raum), ULB (Untere Landwirtschaftsbehörden) Heidenheim (2019): Natürliche Grundlagen. https://lel.landwirtschaft-bw.de/site/pbs-bw-mlr-root/get/documents_E174456775/MLR.LEL/PB5Documents/lel/Abteilung_3/Agrarstuktur/Statistik/A_Dienstbezirke/2021_Nat/ULB%20Heidenheim%20-%20Nat%C3%BCrliche%20Grundlagen.pdf.
LEL, ULB Heidenheim (2022): Landwirtschaft Heidenheim 2021. https://lel.landwirtschaft-bw.de/site/pbs-bw-mlr-root/get/documents_E-302396977/MLR.LEL/PB5Documents/lel/Abteilung_3/Agrarstuktur/Statistik/A_Dienstbezirke/2021_RPS/06_LRA%20Heidenheim_2021.pdf.
Lindkvist, H., Lind, F., Melander, L. (2023): Actor roles and public-private interaction in transitioning networks: the case of geofencing for urban freight transport in Sweden. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing 38 (6): 1376-1389. https://doi.org/10.1108/JBIM-10-2021-0494/FULL/PDF.
Loorbach, D. (2007): Transition management: New mode of governance for sustainable development. International Books. https://repub.eur.nl/pub/10200/proefschrift.pdf.
Loorbach, D., Frantzeskaki, N., Avelino, F. (2017): Sustainability transitions research: Transforming science and practice for societal change. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 42 (1): 599-626. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev-environ-102014-021340.
Loorbach, D., Rotmans, J. (2010): Towards a better understanding of transitions and their governance: A systemic and reflexive approach. In: Schot, J., Grin, J., Rotmans, J. (eds.): Transitions to sustainable development: New directions in the study of long term transformative change: 105-222: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/281364837.
Meadows, D. (1999): Leverage Points: Places to Intervene in a System. Sustainability Institute. https://donellameadows.org/archives/leverage-points-places-to-intervene-in-a-system/.
MLR (Ministerium für Ernährung, Ländlichen Raum und Verbraucherschutz Baden-Württemberg) (n.d.): Biomusterregionen Baden-Württemberg. https://www.biomusterregionen-bw.de/.
MLR (2020): Der weiterentwickelte Aktionsplan „Bio aus Baden-Württemberg“. https://mlr.baden-wuerttemberg.de/de/unser-service/presse-und-oeffentlichkeitsarbeit/pressemitteilungen/pressemitteilung/pid/aktionsplan-bio-weiterer-ausbau-des-oekologischen-landbaus/.
Nevens, F., Frantzeskaki, N., Gorissen, L., Loorbach, D. (2013): Urban transition labs: co-creating transformative action for sustainable cities. Journal of Cleaner Production 50: 111-122. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2012.12.001.
Öko-Valuation (n.d.): Öko-Valuation - Werte und Normen in der Landwirtschaft. https://oekovaluation.de/.
Oliveira, H., Penha-Lopes, G. (2020): Permaculture in Portugal: Social-ecological inventory of a re-ruralizing grassroots movement. European Countryside 12 (1): 30-52. https://doi.org/10.2478/euco-2020-0002.
Pestoff, V.A. (1992): Third sector and co-operative services - An alternative to privatization. Journal of Consumer Policy 15 (1): 21-45. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF01016352/METRICS.
Rockström, J., Steffen, …, Foley, J.A. (2009): A safe operating space for humanity. Nature 461 (7263): 472-475. https://doi.org/10.1038/461472a.
Rotmans, J. (2005): Societal innovation between dream and reality lies complexity. http://www.aeaweb.org/journal/jel_class_system.html.
Schaetzen, S. De (2019): Part of the solution - Organic agriculture and the sustainable development goals. https://www.natureandmore.com/sites/www.natureandmore.com/files/documenten/nm_final_report_en_lr.pdf.
Schiffer, E., Hauck, J. (2010): Net-Map: Collecting Social Network Data and Facilitating Network Learning through Participatory Influence Network Mapping. Field Methods 22 (3): 231-249. https://doi.org/10.1177/1525822X10374798.
Schultz, L., Plummer, R., Purdy, S. (2011): Applying a social-ecological inventory: In Assessing Resilience in Social-Ecological Systems : Workbook for Practitioners. Version 2.0. http://www.resalliance.org/index.php/resilience_assessment.
Seyfang, G., Smith, A. (2007): Grassroots innovations for sustainable development: Towards a new research and policy agenda. Environmental Politics 16 (4): 584-603. https://doi.org/10.1080/09644010701419121.
Snyder, H. (2019): Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research 104: 333-339. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.JBUSRES.2019.07.039.
Steffen, W., Richardson, ..., Sorlin, S. (2015): Planetary boundaries: Guiding human development on a changing planet. Science 347 (6223): 1259855-1259855. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1259855.
Talhof Heidenheim (n.d.): Retrieved February 21, 2024, from https://talhof-hdh.de/.
Timm, I.J., Reuter, L., Berndt, J.O. (2020): Role assignment adaptation: An intentional forgetting approach. Proceedings of the Annual Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2020-January: 4786-4795. https://doi.org/10.24251/HICSS.2020.588.
Turner, R.H. (1990): Role change. Annual Review of Sociology 16 (1): 87-110. https://doi.org/10.1146/annurev.so.16.080190.000511.
United Nations (2015): Transforming our world: The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development. http://www.ustainabledevelopment.un.org.
van Poeck, K., Læssøe, J., Block, T. (2017): An exploration of sustainability change agents as facilitators of nonformal learning: mapping a moving and intertwined landscape. Ecology and Society 22 (2). published online: Jun 15, 2017. https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09308-220233, https://doi.org/10.5751/ES-09308-220233.
Veisi, H., Carolan, M. S., Alipour, A. (2017): Exploring the motivations and problems of farmers for conversion to organic farming in Iran. International Journal of Agricultural Sustainability 15 (3): 303-320. https://doi.org/10.1080/14735903.2017.1312095.
VERBI Software (2021): MAXQDA 2020 [computer software]. https://www.maxqda.com/.
Wittmayer, J.M. (2016): Transition management, action research and actor roles: Understanding local sustainability transitions. PhD thesis. http://hdl.handle.net/1765/94385.
Wittmayer, J.M., Avelino, F., Pel, B., Campos, I. (2021): Contributing to sustainable and just energy systems? The mainstreaming of renewable energy prosumerism within and across institutional logics. Energy Policy 149. https://doi.org/10.1016/J.ENPOL.2020.112053.
Wittmayer, J.M., Avelino, F., van Steenbergen, F., Loorbach, D. (2017): Actor roles in transition: Insights from sociological perspectives. Environmental Innovation and Societal Transitions 24: 45-56. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eist.2016.10.003.
Wittmayer, J.M., Schäpke, N. (2014): Action, research and participation: roles of researchers in sustainability transitions. Sustainability Science 9 (4): 483-496. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11625-014-0258-4.
Zukunftskommission Landwirtschaft (2021): Zukunft Landwirtschaft. Eine gesamtgesell-schaftliche Aufgabe Empfehlungen der Zukunftskommission Landwirtschaft. https://www.bmel.de/SharedDocs/Downloads/DE/_Landwirtschaft/abschlussbericht-zukunftskommission-landwirtschaft.html;jsessionid=CCF76E0880DE690D96145E1586432C5A.live831.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2024 Carolin Schweizerhof, Claudia Bieling
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2024-09-21
Published 2024-11-07
