Stamp - Standardized Data Management Plan for Educational Research
An Approach to Improve Cross-Disciplinary Harmonization of Research Data Management
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.52825/cordi.v1i.372Keywords:
Research Data Management, Standardized Data Management Plan, Harmonization of RDMAbstract
While there is a strong tendency towards a harmonized, cross-disciplinary research data management (RDM) (Netscher et al., 2022), researchers require more guidelines and examples, tailored to their research discipline (Grootveld et al., 2018). Therefore, Science Europe (2018: 9) proposes developing so-called domain data protocols (DDP), “a ‘model DMP’ for a given domain or community”. Based on this concept, the project Domain Data Protocols for Educational Research[1] designed the Stamp - Standardized Data Management Plan for Educational Research (DDP-Bildung and German Network of Educational Research Data, 2023).
Although the Stamp was designed to support researchers in educational research, we expect that RDM is rather a matter of the data processed, the methods employed, and the content of data, than of a particular research discipline or community, such as educational research. To discuss this expectation and the usability of the Stamp outside educational research, we organized various workshops with representatives from other research disciplines. In our talk at the CoRDI 2023, we will introduce the Stamp, recap findings of two of the workshops, introduce the next steps to examine the useability of the Stamp outside educational research, and draw some conclusions on how to adapt the Stamp to other disciplines and how it fosters a harmonized, cross-disciplinary RDM.
[1] The project DDP-Bildung was funded by the German Federal Ministry of Education and Research (grant number: 16QK01).
Downloads
References
DDP-Bildung, and German Network of Educational Research Data (VerbundFDB). 2023. Stamp nutzen – Standardisierter Datenmanagementplan für die Bildungsfor-schung. Version 0.9. Frankfurt am Main: DIPF | Leibniz Institute for Research and In-formation in Education. Available at https://www.forschungsdaten-bildung.de/stamp-nutzen, last access 25 April 2023.
Grootveld, M., et al. 2018. OpenAIRE and FAIR Data Expert Group survey about Horizon 2020 template for Data Management Plans. Version 1.0.0. http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1120245.
KonsortSWD. 2023 Consortium for the Social, Behavioural, Educational and Econom-ic Sciences in the National Research Data Infrastructure (NFDI). Available at https://www.konsortswd.de/, last access 25 April 2023.
Künstler-Sment, J. 2023. Der Stamp in der Beratung. Available at https://www.iqb.hu-berlin.de/fdz/Projekte/Flyer_Stamp.pdf, last access 25 April 2023.
Meyermann, A., et al. 2017.: Der Verbund Forschungsdaten Bildung ‒ Eine For-schungsdateninfrastruktur für die empirische Bildungsforschung. Available at https://www.konsortswd.de/wp-content/uploads/RatSWD_WP_266.pdf, last access 25 April 2023.
Netscher, S, I. Anders, and Ch. Henzen. 2022. Activities and Challenges in Develop-ing Discipline-Specific Data Management Plan Templates: From Vertical to Horizontal Integration of RDM Practices. Bausteine Forschungsdatenmanagement, Nr. 1 (March 2022). pp. 13-25. https://doi.org/10.17192/bfdm.2022.1.8371.
Science Europe. 2018. Science Europe Guidance Document Presenting a Frame-work for Discipline-Specific Research Data Management. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4925906.
Wilkinson, M. D., et al. 2016. The FAIR Guiding Principles for Management and Stewardship. Scientific Data 3. https://doi.org/10.1038/sdata.2016.18.
Downloads
Published
How to Cite
Conference Proceedings Volume
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2023 Sebastian Netscher, Alexia Meyermann, Julia Künstler-Sment, Lisa Pegelow
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.
Accepted 2023-06-29
Published 2023-09-07
Funding data
-
Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Grant numbers 16QK01